🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.